Archive for restaurants

New Bill in Congress May Help Sick Workers

Posted in News Archive with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 12, 2009 by pdxrwa

by William Pilgrim

In response to the hysteria generated by the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) urges workers, “if you have symptoms of influenza-like illness, stay home for 7 days after symptoms begin or until you have been symptom-free for 24 hours, whichever is longer.” The CDC’s advice to employers? Encourage sick employees to stay away from the workplace and to “provide flexible leave policies.”

Unfortunately, it is estimated that nearly 90 percent of restaurant workers are afforded no paid sick leave.  That may soon change if the Healthy Families Act, awaiting approval in the House and Senate, is finally passed.

In the United States alone, “40,617 confirmed and probable infections… have been identified by CDC and state and local public health departments,” since the first case of novel influenza A H1N1 was reported on April 17, 2009.  As October draws closer, ushering in the beginning of the flu season, more and more workers will be faced with the choice of missing work (and potentially being fired) or going to work sick.

Louie Chavez, 24, is a grill cook at a popular cafe in Northwest Portland.  In his six years in the restaurant industry, he has never received a paid sick day or health benefits. Though in the past he’s had the impression that benefits would come some day he says, “After a year of working where I do… I don’t expect to see them at all.”  Chavez says there have been “a few times when there was no one else and [he had] to suck it up and just go” to work while ill. He also had a past employer deny his request to leave after he began feeling nauseous at work.

Restaurant workers, who account for 10 percent of the workforce in Oregon, are among the most vulnerable to airborne illnesses.  As with other strains of flu, H1N1 is spread by person-to-person contact from coughing, sneezing, or contact with bodily fluids. Employees in this industry work in high-traffic areas with numerous points of contact with potentially infected individuals.  Sadly, these workers can least afford to take the CDC’s recommended time off.

A minimum wage worker, working a 33-hour work week, would lose $277 by staying home from work for the seven days suggested by the CDC.  Employees receiving tips lose even more.  Furthermore, few restaurant workers are offered employee health coverage or access to affordable healthcare.   At a time when many Americans are struggling financially, staying home from work because of influenza-like symptoms may not be an option.

There may be hope on the horizon.  So far the cities of San Francisco, Milwaukee, and Washington, D.C. have mandated employee sick leave.  State-level campaigns are developing nationwide.

San Francisco’s Proposition F, passed in 2006, allows any employee to begin accruing paid sick days after 90 calendar days of employment.  Eligible workers are awarded one hour for every 30 hours worked, with a cap of 40 hours for employees of small businesses, and 72 hours for employees of all other businesses. This leave can be accrued from year-to-year, though leave may not exceed the imposed caps.

Nationally, the Healthy Families Act was introduced in the House and Senate late last May by Rep. Rosa DeLauro [D-CT] and Senator Ted Kennedy [D-MA].  The bill is now awaiting approval in the Committee on Education and Labor, the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration.

The Healthy Families Act would require certain employers, at businesses employing 15 or more workers during each working day for 20 or more workweeks a year, to allow employees to accrue at least one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 56 hours.  This sick leave will allow workers to seek medical attention for themselves, or for, ”a child, a parent, a spouse, or any other individual …whose close association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.” The bill also allows employees to use paid sick leave for an absence resulting from domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

The Healthy Families Act is a commendable first step in protecting workers.  Both full-time and part-time employees at the required businesses would be afforded sick leave in the current bill.  The bill also states that employees cannot be required to cover, or search for a replacement, for any sick leave they take.  The Healthy Families Act could also allow same-sex couples or LGBT families leave to care for their partners or children, since many of these families are not covered under traditional, privately offered plans.

According to calculations from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), by providing mandatory leave, “our national economy would experience a net savings of $1.8 billion a year due to increased productivity and reduced turnover.”  Providing sick leave to the more than 170,000 restaurant workers in Oregon would save $9 million a year.

Unfortunately, powerful anti-worker lobbies, like the Oregon Restaurant Association (ORA), have already come out against mandatory sick leave to employees.  The ORA believes that “flexible” work hours and schedules provided by restaurants best meet the needs of their employees, and that “many” restaurants offer a paid-time-off benefits structure that would be threatened by mandatory employee sick leave.

The Healthy Families Act is not a universal solution to public health worries or workers’ rights.  If the act passes in its current form, 30 percent of restaurant workers would still be ineligible for paid leave because their workplaces’ employ fewer than 15 workers.  However, the Healthy Families Act remains a bold initiative towards providing a greater number of food service workers with paid sick leave considering that, according to most estimates, only 10 to 20 percent of current restaurant workers are offered any paid leave.

With the flu season approaching, Congress and the nation cannot afford delay passage of the Healthy Families Act. Although many restaurant workers would still not be covered, it’s an important first step in ensuring that every worker can take care of themselves, or their loved ones, in the event of an illness.  And we can no longer accept a system that encourages low-income workers, especially those handling our food, to work sick in fear of lost wages or retaliation.

Crime Victims’ Leave

Posted in Crime Victims Leave, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) & (OMLA) with tags , , , , on October 22, 2008 by pdxrwa

A crime victim, an individual who “has suffered financial, social, psychological or physical harm as a result of a personal felony,” is eligible for protected leave from work to attend criminal proceedings. This Oregon law treats immediate family members of the person as crime victims as well and defines “immediate family” to include a spouse, domestic partner, father, mother, sibling, child, stepchild or grandparent. A worker is required to provide reasonable notice and documentation of upcoming legal proceeding to her employer before taking leave.

Source:
BOLI: http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/TA/T_FAQ_Crimevictims.shtml

Making a Wage Claim

Posted in Making a Wage Claim with tags , , on October 21, 2008 by pdxrwa

Workers who believe that they have not receive all money due to them under the law can make a wage claim in two different ways: through the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI), or through a private attorney. BOLI will interview the employee and attempt to collect the employee’s unpaid wages, but they will not pursue any wage penalties. Wage penalties are usually several times the actual amount of unpaid wages, and they can only be pursued by a private attorney.

Both Oregon and federal wage laws allow a successful employee to recover their attorney fees from the employer in addition to the unpaid wages and penalties. For this reason, attorneys who handle wage claims will handle them on a contingency basis (i.e. the attorney does not get paid unless the employee wins).

Workers have six years after a wage is unpaid to file a lawsuit to collect those wages. This is called the “statute of limitations.” The statute of limitations for collecting wage penalties is three years after the violation giving rise to the penalty.

Employers are required by law to keep all employee time and pay records for at least three years, so employees who don’t have all of their pay stubs or other documentation of their claims should not be discouraged from making wage claims against their employers. If an employer fails to keep the proper records, BOLI or the court will rely on the employee’s best estimates.

Holidays & Holiday Pay

Posted in Holidays & Holiday Pay, Pay & Wages with tags , , , on October 17, 2008 by pdxrwa

As an “at-will” employment state, Oregon employers are not required to:

  1. provide holidays off for workers
  2. pay workers for being closed on holidays
  3. provide any compensation above the regular rate of pay for work performed on a holiday (unless 40 or more hours are worked in the holiday week, then standard overtime pay is mandatory)

The only exceptions to this rule are if your employer has a written policy (like an employee handbook) that states holiday pay is given or if you are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Source:
BOLI: http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/TA/T_FAQ_Holidaypay.shtml
http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/TA/TA_COL_122407_Holiday_Pay.pdf

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.